Here is the table that we will use for web pages on each better practice.
Dimension within the New Paradigm:
Summary Description of this Better Practice
(A concise description of the better practice expressed in practical terms) Key Readings: Practitioners, officials or researchers who are willing to respond to brief inquiries on this better practice: (Contacts willing to answer brief questions or to refer colleagues to various sources of advice) |
Chat-Box
(Post your questions, response, news in this space) |
Indicators of Progress/Improvement Objectives:
(Authoritative criteria and indicators for measuring progress using a rubric assessment model to indicate gradients)
Essential Criteria:
(Using the four-point scale that we have borrowed from the World Bank SABER program, countries can self-assess their work as being “latent/dormant” (just starting work on this better practice) to “emerging/restarting” as they meet the essential criteria listed or noted here.)
Other high- quality elements that can lead to a self-rating as “established/maintained” according to the adapted World Bank scale include:
(Authoritative criteria and indicators for measuring progress using a rubric assessment model to indicate gradients)
Essential Criteria:
(Using the four-point scale that we have borrowed from the World Bank SABER program, countries can self-assess their work as being “latent/dormant” (just starting work on this better practice) to “emerging/restarting” as they meet the essential criteria listed or noted here.)
Other high- quality elements that can lead to a self-rating as “established/maintained” according to the adapted World Bank scale include:
Pathways to Improvement:
(This sub-section will list more qualitative, incremental, practical Improvements that can be considered while seeking a self-assessed “advanced” rating) |
The Rationale:
(Research, reports, data, statements etc. that support this better practice) |
Related Resources:
(Examples, Tools, Manuals, Presentations) |